Playing with Janek the first scenario of Kingdom of Heaven (Scenario A – The First Crusade) really sparked interest in us to continue with the further scenarios. This game had all things we cherish in boardgames: great historical theme, great (albeit sometimes too detailed) rules, nice components (once you clip them) and great implementation of card driven mechanics.
So not long after first session, we played again. Below elaborate session report, with game introduction, historical background and conclusion and tons of (hopefully) nice pictures. Enjoy!
About the Game
In 1097, thousands of lords and knights, soldiers and camp-followers, pilgrims and prophets marched east in response to a Papal appeal, charged with the task of restoring Jerusalem and the Holy Land to Christian control. Their surprising victory led to the creation of the first overseas European colonies and the reshaping of Muslim power in the Middle East. The repercussions of their journey continue to live with us today.
In Kingdom of Heaven – The Crusader States 1097-1291 (KOH) two players use cards to activate forces, trigger random events, conduct diplomacy or prosecute siege warfare on a vast arena stretching from Antioch to Cairo and from Cyprus to Mosul.
Nine scenarios cover all the major campaigns of the era, from the First, Second and Third Crusades to the Mongol invasion and the rise of the Mamluk Empire. In addition to the ‘basic deck,’ each scenario adds different cards representing historical events unique to that campaign. Turns are yearly, and most scenarios can be finished in 3-4 hours.
Historical Scenario Background
Before presenting the session report, let us talk a bit about the Scenario B – The Second Crusade – and its historical background. For me this is first and foremost a lesson in history, and the game allows me to reshape it or even change completely!
The First Crusade was followed by a period of consolidation. Oddly enough, no one had discussed what was supposed to happen if the First Crusade actually succeeded. Most of the lords and knights departed for home, while others carved out for themselves lands in the Near East.
At Antioch, Bohemond’s heirs ruled. Further south, around Tripoli, the old Crusader Raymond of Toulouse made a small principality for himself, although he died before he could do much with it. At Jerusalem, Raymond had refused the crown, hoping thereby to dissuade anyone else from taking it. The ploy failed when Godfrey of Bouillon agreed to become Defender of the Holy Sepulchre.
When Godfrey died, his followers invited Baldwin of Edessa to become King of Jerusalem, and he agreed to head the new kingdom. He handed Edessa over to an old ally, Joscelyn of Courtenay. For the next thirty years, Christians and Muslims tussled, with little permanent damage done on either side.
In the 1140’s the Byzantine Emperor John II showed up in the north with a large army, and briefly imposed his suzerainty on Antioch. His death in 1143 created a power vacuum in the north. This allowed Zengi, the ruler of Mosul, to strike the first blow in the Muslim
Set-Up
With the background done, let us now look at the scenario set-up. For this, we will need to cover several aspects.
Scenario Length: 1144-1149 (six turns – standard for thie game)
Scenario Cards Used: B0-B4 – those cards provide special events, specific to the scenario, which enhance the basic deck.
Powers and their initial alignment – some might be influenced during the game:
- Pro-Christian: Byzantium, Lesser Armenia, Principality of Antioch, County of Edessa, County of Tripoli, Kingdom of Jerusalem, Hospitallers
- Pro-Muslim: Seljuk Turks
- Neutral: Damascus, Caliphate of the Fatimids, Assassins
Special Rules:
- Crusade: A Crusade will arrive on Turn 4 if the Muslim player has 6 or more VP. If they do not, the game ends with a Christian auto-victory
- Any Crusaders leaving the Constantinople Box must roll TWICE for Attrition on the 16–19 column (regardless of force size).
Victory Conditions:
- Christian Victory: Christian Player has 25 or more VP (starts with 24)
- Muslim Victory: Muslim Player has 9 or more VP (starts with 3)
And of course, the initial Map and Forces:



Session Report
It was already second session with this game, however, after longer break. Again, we were still treating this to large extent as learning experience with the system and supported / commented on all our actions to better familiarize with it. How it went the picture-rich classic AAR will tell 🙂









Our Session Conclusion
After about 4 hours of play we concluded the game at the end of turn 6. Below the final result:

Historical Conclusion
And how did it ended historically? Let us see:
In 1144 Zengi struck at Edessa. With poor leadership and a weak army, Edessa couldn’t hold out for long. The city fell on Christmas Eve. The first Crusader state had fallen.
The news did not immediately cause panic, but in 1145 Pope Eugenius III issued a new crusading bull: Quantum praedecessores. Preached by the charismatic priest St. Bernard of Clairvaux, soon the monarchs of France and Germany, and a large host of followers took up the cross. The land route across Asia Minor, hallowed by the passage of the First Crusade, was again the route chosen.
The Crusaders set off from Constantinople in 1147. This time, the result was different. Although the Byzantine Emperor Manuel I offered assistance, lack of forage and strong enemy resistance took a heavy toll on the marchers. The German contingent was nearly massacred; Conrad fell sick but was personally nursed back to health by Manuel. Meanwhile King Louis had won his way to Attaleia, but the Byzantines did not have nearly the ships to send everyone by sea. Eventually, after further losses, the greatly reduced band of Crusaders made it to the Holy Land.
Once there, they no longer had the forces to strike at Zengi directly. It was decided, therefore, to go after Damascus. This was a royally stupid move (no pun intended). Damascus was neutral and actually leaning toward an alliance with the Christians as defense against Zengi. The local barons may have recognized this, as there is some evidence the campaign was sabotaged.
As soon as the army settled down to besiege Damascus, it was decided to move the camp from the west side of the city to the east. Coincidentally, the east side of the city had no water supplies, so the army was forced to return home after only three days. Nothing further was accomplished and the Crusaders returned home dejected and disillusioned. Meanwhile Zengi had died and been replaced by Nur ad-Din, who proved an even bigger thorn in the side of the Christians than had his predecessor.
Summary
After playing the second scenario, I can honestly say the game won us over. We know the cards better, we understand the mechanics well and see ow they interact with each other. The historical accuracy, meticulous attention to detail, and – most importantly – the brilliant portrayal of siege warfare and the attrition armies endured in those times left definitely a lasting impression on us.
More reports to come!




Great report, and it seems like the outcome of the game was very close!
I’m looking forward to the third crusade with all the famous monarchs from Barbarossa to Saladin in it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed, the game was close and tense. With the hindsight of knowing how history unfolded, one can avoid some pitfalls.
As for the Third Crusade, we will have a short interlude as Scenario C will focus on the Muslim-Christian struggle for control of Egypt Caliphate. Only once it was unified by Saladin with the rest of his possessions, the Third Crusade had erupted in full swing (Scenario D).
LikeLiked by 1 person
That sounds very interesting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, it will be. We just recently played Scenario C, and it was a back and forth one. With some very interesting alternate strategies 🙂 In several weeks I should post the AAR.
LikeLiked by 1 person